{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
shahrazad
عضو رائد
    
المشاركات: 1,613
الانضمام: Jan 2004
|
التلازم بين الذكاء والشذوذ الجنسي ..
Recent estimates in Western countries, where egalitarian relationships predominate, range from 1% to 10%,
However, being atheist, agnostic or secularist does not necessarily imply support for gay rights or approval of homosexuality. Various non-believers disapprove of homosexuality for various cultural, personal, and other non-religious reasons, and secular states, such as the countries of the Communist bloc, can at the same time be antagonistic to homosexuality.
Some same-sex oriented persons actually prefer the term homosexual to gay, seeing the former as describing a sexual orientation and the latter as describing a cultural or socio-political group with which they do not identify
some early writers used the adjective homosexual to refer to any single-gender context (such as an all-girls' school), today the term implies a sexual aspect. The term homosocial is now used to describe single-sex contexts that are not specifically sexual.
Derogatory terms include fag or faggot, which generally refer to gay men; poof, used mostly in the United Kingdom; queer, generally inclusive of anyone who is not exclusively heterosexual, but also reclaimed as affirming by many gays and academics; Gay and homo, common terms of abuse among adolescents; and dyke, which refers to lesbians. See Homophobia
Given how confusing and overloaded various terms can be, when specificity is important, new terms are starting to be pressed into service. For example, Men who have sex with men, or MSM for short, is sometimes used in the medical community when specifically discussing sexual behavior (regardless of sexual orientation or self-identification). Non-straight is another attempt at neutrality that is gaining currency.
Some scientific studies suggest gay men's anatomical brain structure is similar to that of heterosexual women and different from their heterosexual male counterparts. Other studies such as the March 2000 Breedlove finger length report [1] and the July 2000 University of Texas study of neurological auditory response [2] suggest that while lesbians show characteristics intermediate between heterosexual men and women, gay men are "hyper-masculinized". Some researchers have found that if one of a set of identical twins self-identifies as a gay man or lesbian, the chance of the other identifying as gay is increased to 50%, although other researchers' twin studies have found widely differing percentages.
Various psychologists, anthropologists and sociologists including Sigmund Freud, Margaret Mead, and Michael Foucault have held that neither exclusive heterosexuality nor exclusive homosexuality are innate and only exist due to the effects of outside societal or developmental influences on the individual. In the same vein, writer Gore Vidal once remarked that "there is no such thing as a homosexual or heterosexual person. There are only homo- or heterosexual acts. Most people are a mixture of impulses if not practices, and what anyone does with a willing partner is of no social or cosmic significance". The lesbian-feminist movement has historically held the position that sexual orientation is socially and psychologically created and openly encouraged women to choose lesbianism over "compulsory heterosexuality" (as Adrienne Rich called it in her 1980 essay "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence") for the sake of women's liberation.
Many studies, most notably the Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and the Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953) by Alfred Kinsey have found that the majority of humans have had homosexual experiences or sensations and are bisexual. Only a minority of people were found (5–10%) to be exclusively heterosexual or homosexual. Conversely, an even smaller minority of people appear to have had equal sexual experiences with both genders indicating an attraction scale or continuum. Other studies have suggested these reports exaggerated the occurrence of bisexuality and homosexuality in human populations. However, his idea of a sexuality continuum still enjoys wide acceptance today and is supported by findings in the human and animal kingdoms as well as biological studies of structural brain differences between those belonging to different sexual orientations. Many argue that the discrepancies between public and private admissions regarding sexual orientation are due to negative societal attitudes regarding same-sex intercourse
|
|
06-30-2005, 09:18 PM |
|
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
shahrazad
عضو رائد
    
المشاركات: 1,613
الانضمام: Jan 2004
|
التلازم بين الذكاء والشذوذ الجنسي ..
اقتباس: ] shahrazad كتب/كتبت [/]
ضليع إذا استدبرته سد فرجه
بضاف فويق الأرض ليس بأعزل
فعادى عداء بين ثور ونعجة
دراكا ولم ينضح بماء فيغسل
كنت أحسب هذا البيت تجربة شاذة للشاعر، ولكن أغلب المراجع تقول أنه كان يصف حصانه وليس غلاما، بدأ الكلام بأن الغلام الصغير لا يستطيع ركوب مثل هذا الحصان صعب المراس، ثم وصف الحصان فحسبته يصف الغلام، وهذا خلط متوقع في ظل الوعي ( أواللاوعي )الجمعي الحالي الذي خلق حديثا لمثل هذا الأمور، ويمكن أن يقدم كدليل تاريخي خاطيء .
So the Arabic literature was clear of homosexualities until they invaded Europe and read the greek's books, no men, no boys, no shemales, the Zionist organizations tells us that Buddism didn’t stand against the same sex relationships, and jump immediately to the next point without telling us or giving us time to remember that Buda, told his students not to deal with females, not to touch them, not to speak to them, not to look at them, and when his best student Ananda, in the famous story asked him what if one lady start talk to him, he told him to answer her ( what a polite !! ) but keep the conversation as short as possible and not to look as much as he can ! now what the poor guys would do !? the difference between Buda and Plato on one hand, and Jesus and Mohammad on the other, is that women are more kept away from philosophy then her to be kept away from religion, because in religion she would just teach the inherited rules to children or to other women, but not to men, she must know religion very well to be abele to educate children and rise them, she can teach the rules, but not making them, or reshaped them, if she dare to try, and started become strong, man start give her more authorities on the field of transferring the rules , like in Iran lately, how they allow women to be Imam of pray of a group of women instead of elderly man, and how she even can have this leadership on men like in muslems of west, because can man allow her to teach him what other men said, but not to teach him how to think .
وذكرت النماذج الأخرى للمقارنة بين أغراض الغزل السوي في الشعر العربي والآخر الشاذ لدراسة الفروقات بين نفسية كل منهما، حيث توجد أغراض شعرية في الأدب الجاهلي موجهة من رجل لرجل منها المديح والاعتذار وصلة الرحم والنصيحة والشكر وكلها تحمل عاطفة صادقة قوية، وبعضها مثل ( فمالي أراني وابن عمي مالكا، متى أدن منه ينأ عني ويبعد ) يمكن حتى أن يفسرها من يشاء على أنها حب شاذ ، لولا شدة حضور الأنوثة والأمومة في أدب ذلك العصر ( لخولة أطلال ببرقة ثهمد ، تلوح كباقي الوشم في ظاهر اليد ) .
|
|
07-04-2005, 06:08 AM |
|
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}
|