{myadvertisements[zone_1]}
هل القراءات المتعددة لآية أو جزء من آية يعني حتمية التحريف ؟
coptic eagle غير متصل
عضو متقدم
****

المشاركات: 699
الانضمام: Aug 2010
مشاركة: #112
الرد على: هل القراءات المتعددة لآية أو جزء من آية يعني حتمية التحريف ؟
Dead Sea scrolls

Fragments of three deuterocanonical books have been found among the Dead Sea scrolls found at Qumran. Sirach, whose Hebrew text was already known from the Cairo Geniza, has been found in two scrolls (2QSir or 2Q18, 11QPs_a or 11Q5) in Hebrew. Another Hebrew scroll of Sirach has been found in Masada (MasSir).[7]:597 The Book of Tobit has been found in Qumran in four scrolls written in Aramaic and in one written in Hebrew.[7]:636 The Letter of Jeremiah (or Baruch chapter 6) has been found in cave 7 (7Q5) in Greek.[7]:628

It has been theorized by recent scholars that the Qumran library was not entirely produced at Qumran, but may have included part of the library of the Jerusalem Temple, that may have been hidden in the caves for safekeeping at the time it was destroyed by Romans in 70 AD.

[edit] Influence of the Septuagint

The large majority of Old Testament references in the New Testament are taken from the Greek Septuagint (LXX)—which includes the deuterocanonical books, as well as apocrypha —both of which are called collectively anagignoskomena (things that are read, good to be read, or "profitable reading").[8] Several appear to have been written originally in Hebrew, but the original text has long been lost. Archaeological finds, however, discovered some original texts among the Dead Sea scrolls. The Septuagint was widely accepted and used by Greek-speaking Jews in the first century, even in the region of Roman Judea, and therefore naturally became the text most widely used by early Christians, who were predominantly Greek speaking.

In the New Testament, Hebrews 11:35 refers to an event that was recorded in one of the deuterocanonical books (2 Maccabees It is also a reference to 1 Kings17:22-23 7).[9] Other New Testament authors also quote period literature which was familiar to the audience but that was not included in the Old Testament or the deuterocanonical books. For instance, Paul cites Greek writers and philosophers, and the author of Hebrews references oral tradition which spoke of an Old Testament prophet who was sawn in half in Hebrews 11:37, two verses after the 2nd Maccabees reference.

The Jewish historian Josephus speaks of there being 22 books in the canon of the Hebrew Bible,[10] a Jewish tradition reported also by the Christian bishop Athanasius. However, included in Athanasius's list of 22 Old Testament books are Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah. At the same time, he mentioned that certain other books, including five deuterocanonical books but also the Didache and the Shepherd of Hermas, while not being part of the canon, "were appointed by the Fathers to be read". He excluded what he called "apocryphal writings" entirely.[11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterocano...te-Abegg-6
05-27-2012, 05:37 PM
عرض جميع مشاركات هذا العضو إقتباس هذه الرسالة في الرد
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}


الردود في هذا الموضوع
الرد على: هل القراءات المتعددة لآية أو جزء من آية يعني حتمية التحريف ؟ - بواسطة coptic eagle - 05-27-2012, 05:37 PM

المواضيع المحتمل أن تكون متشابهة…
الموضوع الكاتب الردود المشاهدات آخر رد
  اسطورة تواتر القراءات القرانية fancyhoney 64 13,474 06-06-2014, 08:52 AM
آخر رد: fancyhoney
  بدون بردية , التحريف ثابت مية المية و الدليل السبعونية الصفي 54 10,576 01-23-2013, 06:01 PM
آخر رد: الصفي
  شبكة القراءات القرآنية ( القران الجامع ) الفكر الحر 11 5,581 08-02-2011, 09:27 AM
آخر رد: الفكر الحر
  كتب لا غنى عنها في القراءات العشر zaidgalal 3 2,280 10-22-2010, 10:13 PM
آخر رد: rrqqwwee
  مقدمة في اختلافات القراءات fancyhoney 7 3,374 08-30-2010, 04:56 PM
آخر رد: fancyhoney

الانتقال السريع للمنتدى:


يتصفح هذا الموضوع من الأعضاء الان: بالاضافة الى ( 1 ) زائر
{myadvertisements[zone_2]}
إتصل بنا | نادي الفكر العربي | العودة للأعلى | | الوضع البسيط (الأرشيف) | خلاصات التغذية RSS