اقتباس:So, now that the existence of God is both scientifically and emotionally
Acceptable; why do you think God does not exist?

You've put here two arguments, "emotional" and "scientific"

Before i start, i want to state two things from my own point of view:

1. If we gona discuss moral God, it is an endless discussion with no result in the end as each one could still hold his opinion as per his believe.

2. If we could prove the existence of god in a scientific matter this well lead to a god that obey our own understanding of the universe, a material god, not an absolute one.

now i am trying to find your scientific argument.

the story about monkeys is not a good example cuz i see the universe random and not organized, take the earth for an example which is in a relatively quiet place in the universe, it is hit by a large asteroid every 400-500 thousand years!

let me discuss hawking quote:

1. in a strong anthropic theory, endless parallel universes exits, so it is not a major thing that biological systems evolve to create life forms in one of the tiny planets in one of the huge number of galaxies in one of endless universes.

2.about the weak anthropic theory, i did not understand what you wanted to say, but for the house example this is not the way, a anthropic point of view tells me if i wanna put an understanding for the exictance of the house, i should take the fact that i live in it in my understanding so i do not put a hypothesis that contradicts with the fact that i live in the house in this moment.

Finally, wellcome to our forum ,