God is not, and cannot be, a scientific hypothesis.

Look at this website to find out why
http://sci.waikato.ac.nz/evolution/Theories.shtml


Back to your argument. You're saying that if we have to choose between the "weak anthropic theory" and God, God is more probable.

How do you know that? That is a totally subjective judgement. I advise you against using the word "probable" so loosely. What numbers do you have to weigh the probabilities of these two possibilities? Have you measured their probabilities somehow? Do you have any statistical data to allow us to examine these "probabilities"?


As for your argument that God chose to create an imperfect world, it is an infalsifiable subjective claim. Let's take the monkeys example. Say a bunch of monkeys wrote a meaningless book. Someone like you might come along and say, "This book was actually written by Shakespeare, but he CHOSE to write such mumbo jumbo. Even though he is a great writer, he chose to write something so imperfect."

Again, that is a subjective claim that can neither be proven nor disproven.