( 2 3 )

النظرية 2 : نظرية الأشعاع

The Radiation Theory
Could the image have been produced by a burst of radiation (heat or light) acting over short period of time which would have scorched the cloth? Scientists have not been able to duplicate the characteristics of the Shroud using this method just like the painting hypothesis. Also the color and ultraviolet characteristics of the Shroud body image and a scorch are different. The shroud body image does not fluoresce under UV light but scorches like the burns from 1532 do fluoresce under UV light. Thus many scientists rule out the radiation theory.

أنفجار أشعاعي قد يكون هو الذي سبب تكون الصورة و لكن الصورة المنطبعة على الكفن لا تتعمل من الأضاءة بنفس الكيفية
مما جعل أغلب العلماء يرفضون نظرية الأشعاع في تكوين الصورة .


نظرية 3 : نظرية التلامس المباشر .

DeSalvo's Revised Vaporgraphic - Direct Contact Theory
There are other theories regarding vapors from the body diffusing to the Shroud and producing the image. Another theory is a direct contact process in which substances were directly transferred to the cloth and produced the image.
DeSalvo's Theory takes both of these into consideration.


My theory does not answer all the questions. Some problems are that the Shroud body image is a surface phenomena but the Volckringer patterns are not. They penetrate into the paper. Also calculations using diffusion of lactic acid would not produce the high resolution of the image we see on the Shroud. Thus my theory does not explain all the characteristics of the Shroud and more research needs to be done. Thus no one theory to date can explain how the image on the Shroud was produced.

بأختصار هذه النظرية تعتمد على أن المواد الناتجة من الجسم بعد الموت و عن طريق التلامس قد كونت الصورة ألا أن ذلك يتطلب
أن تخترق هذه المواد كامل سمك القماش في حين أن الصورة المتكونة على القماش شبه سطحية فهي لا تخترق ألا بضعة ميكرونات
من سطح الكتان كما أن المواد المتلامسة لا تعطي هذه الدرجة من ال resolution الموجودة بالشكل الموجود .


The most amazing evidence to the reality of the Shroud is that it is a PHOTOGRAPHIC NEGATIVE.
Secondo Pia was the Shroud's first photographer. The Italian photographed this
faint image on a light-colored material. To his great surprise, when Pia examined his negatives, there was a positive image! By photographing the negative, you have created a positive. The faint image became a light image on a black background. Details emerged that astounded viewers and enlarged the Shroud's controversy.
What could have formed this negative? It certainly was not a 1000 year old artist faking a holy relic. Some say the image captures the moment of Christ's resurrection. Others say that the image was a scorching emanating out due to RADIATION. There were reports that after the Hiroshima blast, pieces of glass were found with negative images of people's faces. These were people who had their faces near windows when the atomic bomb exploded. Radiation does cause negative imprinting.

نأتي الآن للجزء الهام و هو أن الصورة المتكونة على القماش عبارة عن صورة negative لشخص مات نتيجة
للصلب و عند تصويرها بكاميرا فوتوغرافية يكون النيجاتيف الخاص بصورة الكفن هو نفس الموجب الخاص بالأصل
لأن سالب السالب = موجب الأصل .

أي أن النيجاتيف للنيجاتيف = الصورة الأصلية للشخص المصور على القماش .
و هذا هو ما حدث مع أول مصور ألتقط صورة للكفن في نهاية القرن التاسع عشر وهو المصور الأيطالي سكوندو بيا .
( يتبع )