السلام علي من اتبع الهدي

ومرحبا بالزميل ميراج

اقتباس
_______________________

أرنا يا زميل مسلم.. إنجيل واحد بدونها!!!
علمنا يا زميلنا المسلم ما ضحكوا علينا فيه هؤلاء المسيحيين!!!
هيا.. أنتظرك لتفحمنى بإنجيل بدون هذه الفقرات..
"قُلْ هَاتُواْ بُرْهَانَكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ"

_______________________

عزيزي النسخ الحديثة مثل NIV و JB و LB و TEV

لم يقوموا بحذف الفقرة 9 الي 20 بل وضعوا بعد الفقرة 8 تنويه مقدس بان الفقرات التالية غير موجودة بالمخطوطات القديمة

((The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:920.))


و انظر ماجاء باحد المواقع النصرانية حول هذا الموضوع:

http://www.gotquestions.org/Mark-16-9-20.html


Question: "Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible?"



Answer: Although the vast majority of Greek manuscripts contain Mark 16:9-20, the Gospel of Mark ends at verse 8 in some Greek texts, including two of the oldest and most respected manuscripts. This possibly suggests that as time went on scribes added this ending, either for the richness of its material or because of the abruptness of the ending at verse 8. There are three possible explanations for why Mark would’ve ended his Gospel at verse 8: (1) Mark wanted to intentionally end his Gospel in an open-ended fashion, (2) the Gospel of Mark was never finished, (3) the last “page” of the manuscript was lost prior to copying. I personally prefer option (1). The literary power of ending the Gospel of Mark so abruptly at verse 8 would result in the readers being drawn into the story. They must now ask, ‘What will I do with Jesus?’ Whatever the case, it is probably not wise to base any doctrine or practice on Mark 16:9-20 since the verses are possibly not original, and therefore not inspired by God.

Recommended Resource: Scripture Alone by James White.


وادخل علي هذا الرابط ايضا:

http://www.bible-researcher.com/endmark.html


سلام